Political disagreements can make family conversations especially challenging during a period of intense polarization. Robert and Sam Reich say that approaching those discussions with patience and genuine interest can help people connect without pretending their differences do not exist.

The pair discussed the subject alongside Robert Reich’s new documentary, The Work in Progress. The film brings together people from different generations, including 30-year-olds and 80-year-olds, to talk about what it means to be American and what people owe one another. It is being screened at theaters across the country this fall.

Robert Reich, an emeritus professor of public policy at UC Berkeley and former U.S. labor secretary, has also built a large audience on TikTok, with help from his son. Sam Reich, an improv comedian and CEO of Dropout TV, encouraged his father to use video to reach younger audiences. Robert now runs Inequality Media.

For the two, constructive conversation begins with meeting in person. Sam says online exchanges can create the illusion of connection while keeping people inside algorithm-driven bubbles. In person, Robert argues, people can see one another’s reactions and encounter each other as whole human beings. The documentary uses carefully created settings to encourage that kind of exchange.

Respect and curiosity matter, too. Sam recalls that his father’s friendship with Republican senator Alan Simpson showed him that political disagreement need not erase affection or respect. He advises approaching people with curiosity rather than treating every encounter as an immediate opportunity to change someone’s mind.

Humor can help lower the tension when circumstances allow, Robert says. He also suggests beginning with everyday experiences people share, such as the cost of groceries or gas, rather than opening with highly charged political topics. Sam similarly recommends finding common ground before trying to persuade someone.

The pair caution against relying on political buzzwords. Sam says discussing the specific policies and beliefs behind a label can be more useful than arguing over a term whose meaning may differ from one person to another. Robert also warns that media formats can reward anger and conflict, even when people discover they agree on more than they expected.

Their goal, Robert says, is not to eliminate disagreement or make everyone agree. He considers differing views important to democracy, while also acknowledging that understanding someone’s perspective does not mean having unlimited tolerance for it.

Sources: Rolling Stone.